This blog is dedicated to sharing ideas and resources that can advance learning and democracy in the United States and elsewhere.

Sunday, February 22, 2015

Posttraumatic Test Disorder: A New Disability?


One might posit a Maslow-style hierarchy of responses to the standardized test mania that has swept the United States as the misbegotten child of “reform,” another word for corporatization of public education. Pearson and other test-producing corporations are raking in profits at the expense of parents, children, and educators. At the top of this response hierarchy are the academic arguments against testing: that standardized tests are being cobbled together contrary to acceptable practice standards for test development, that tests are being overused and misused to draw unwarranted conclusions about students, teachers, schools, and communities. All of these are true, but they aren’t the concerns that trouble parents.

At the most basic level of this hierarchy parents are worried about the health, welfare, and safety of their children who are being exposed to toxic levels of testing. If test mania continues we may need to consider a new category of disability: PTTD, or Posttraumatic Test Disorder. You may think this is a joke; it’s not. Consider how “shell shock,” a World War I era term, has evolved into our current understanding of posttraumatic stress disorder, or PTSD, the physical/mental response to trauma. Similarly, we may soon need to reconsider old-fashioned “test anxiety” in a new, more serious light.

Parents’ concerns are justified. As increasing amounts of testing have been mandated by federal and state legislatures, more and more parents are noticing in their children the symptoms of stress associated with test anxiety, such as headaches, nausea, anger, and fear. When these anxiety responses occur occasionally, they may be fairly easily managed. But the ramping up of teaching to the test, practicing for the test, and taking the test renders such anxiety a nearly constant companion, an endless trauma state.

“Stressed elementary students in grades two through four tend to show emotional stress behaviors such as crying, throwing tantrums, wetting themselves, and vomiting,” says Tim Urdan, assistant professor of psychology at Santa Clara University. “The older kids, such as those in high school, are more likely to show ‘rebellious’ responses: refusal to participate, cutting class, and deliberately undermining the test by answering incorrectly on purpose.”* Parents cannot fail to notice these anxiety symptoms, and they are worried and angry that mandated over-testing is the problem, regardless whether the tests themselves are good or bad. They are bad for kids.

The dirty, not-so-little secret of test-oriented education systems is that they produce more problems than positives. They are conformity-based and do not encourage creativity, but even more problematic is that the stress caused by intensive standardized testing tends over time to inhibit learning. Tiredness, worry, lack of appetite, and increased infections—all stress-related—disrupt the ability to concentrate.

Sometimes test anxiety leads to more dire consequences. Across Asian test-oriented education systems, for example, student suicide frequently is attributed to test anxiety. The researchers who wrote China’s annual “Blue Book of Education” (2014) concluded that “most of the teenagers who killed themselves are in middle school, and they did so mainly because they could not bear the heavy pressure of the test-oriented education system.”**

Increasingly, worried and angry parents are demanding an end to the overuse and misuse of standardized tests because toxic test anxiety is traumatizing their children. Such abuse needs to stop before PTTD becomes an actual disability designation.


*Quoted in Edelstein, D. (2000, July 12). “Tests + Stress = Problems for Students.” Brain Connection. http://brainconnection.brainhq.com/2000/07/12/tests-stress-problems-for-students/

**Zhao, X. (2014, May 14). “China’s School Tests Blamed for Suicides.” China Daily. http://www.chinadailyasia.com/news/2014-05/14/content_15135133.html

No comments:

Post a Comment